Trump asks Supreme Courtroom to postpone TikTok ban – Melissas Meals Freedom

US President-elect Donald Trump requested the Supreme Courtroom on Friday, December 27, to pause the potential TikTok ban from going into impact till his administration can pursue a “political decision” to the difficulty.

The request got here as TikTok and the Biden administration filed opposing briefs to the court docket, wherein the corporate argued the court docket ought to strike down a regulation that would ban the platform by Jan. 19 whereas the federal government emphasised its place that the statute is required to get rid of a nationwide safety danger.

“President Trump takes no place on the underlying deserves of this dispute. As an alternative, he respectfully requests that the Courtroom think about staying the Act’s deadline for divestment of January 19, 2025, whereas it considers the deserves of this case,” stated Trump’s amicus temporary, which supported neither celebration within the case and was written by D. John Sauer, Trump’s selection for solicitor common.

The argument submitted to the court docket is the most recent instance of Trump inserting himself into nationwide points earlier than he takes workplace, holding conferences with international leaders and enterprise officers at his Mar-a-Lago membership in Florida. The Republican president-elect has already begun negotiating with different nations over his plans to impose tariffs, and he intervened earlier this month in a plan to fund the federal authorities, calling for a bipartisan plan to be rejected and sending Republicans again to the negotiating desk.

Trump has reversed his place on the favored app, becoming a member of TikTok throughout his 2024 presidential marketing campaign. His electoral group used it to attach with youthful voters, particularly male voters, by pushing content material that was typically macho and aimed toward going viral.

Violation of the First Modification

The filings Friday come forward of oral arguments scheduled for January 10 on whether or not the regulation, which requires TikTok to divest from its China-based father or mother firm or face a ban, unlawfully restricts speech in violation of the First Modification. The regulation was signed by President Joe Biden in April after it handed Congress with broad bipartisan help. TikTok and ByteDance filed a authorized problem afterward.

Earlier this month, a panel of three federal judges on the US Courtroom of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld the statute, main TikTok to attraction the case to the Supreme Courtroom.

The temporary from Trump stated he opposes banning TikTok at this junction and “seeks the power to resolve the problems at hand by way of political means as soon as he takes workplace.”

Of their temporary to the Supreme Courtroom on Friday, attorneys for TikTok and its father or mother firm ByteDance argued the federal appeals court docket erred in its ruling and primarily based its determination on “alleged ‘dangers’ that China may train management” over TikTok’s U.S. platform by pressuring its international associates.

The Biden administration has argued in court docket that TikTok poses a nationwide safety danger because of its connections to China. Officers say Chinese language authorities can compel ByteDance at hand over data on TikTok’s U.S. patrons or use the platform to unfold or suppress data. However the authorities “concedes that it has no proof China has ever tried to take action,” TikTok’s authorized submitting stated, including that the US fears are predicated on future dangers.